Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (2024)

Physical Review A

covering atomic, molecular, and optical physics and quantum information
  • Highlights
  • Letters
  • Recent
  • Accepted
  • Collections
  • Authors
  • Referees
  • Search
  • Press
  • About
  • Editorial Team

Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials

F. S. S. Rosa, D. A. R. Dalvit, and P. W. Milonni
Phys. Rev. A 78, 032117 – Published 26 September 2008
  • Article
  • References
  • Citing Articles (97)

PDFHTMLExport Citation

Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (1)

Abstract
Authors
Article Text
  • INTRODUCTION
  • CASIMIR-LIFsh*tZ FORCE BETWEEN…
  • METALLIC-BASED METAMATERIALS AND THE…
  • DIELECTRIC-BASED METAMATERIALS AND THE…
  • DISCUSSION
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • References

    Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (2)

    Abstract

    We extend our previous work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 183602 (2008)] on the generalization of the Casimir-Lifsh*tz theory to treat anisotropic magnetodielectric media, focusing on the forces between metals and magnetodielectric metamaterials and on the possibility of inferring magnetic effects by measurements of these forces. We present results for metamaterials including structures with uniaxial and biaxial magnetodielectric anisotropies, as well as for structures with isolated metallic or dielectric properties that we describe in terms of filling factors and a Maxwell Garnett approximation. The elimination or reduction of Casimir “stiction” by appropriate engineering of metallic-based metamaterials, or the indirect detection of magnetic contributions, appear from the examples considered to be very challenging, as small background Drude contributions to the permittivity act to enhance attraction over repulsion, as does magnetic dissipation. In dielectric-based metamaterials the magnetic properties of polaritonic crystals, for instance, appear to be too weak for repulsion to overcome attraction. We also discuss Casimir-Polder experiments, that might provide another possibility for the detection of magnetic effects.

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (3)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (4)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (5)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (6)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (7)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (8)
    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (9)

    5 More

    • Received 16 July 2008

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032117

    ©2008 American Physical Society

    Authors & Affiliations

    F. S. S. Rosa, D. A. R. Dalvit, and P. W. Milonni

    • Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

    Article Text (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    References (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    Issue

    Vol. 78, Iss. 3 — September 2008

    Reuse & Permissions
    Access Options
    Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (12)

    Authorization Required

    Other Options
    • Buy Article »
    • Find an Institution with the Article »

    ×

    Download & Share

    PDFExportReuse & PermissionsCiting Articles (97)

    ×

    Images

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (13)

      Figure 1

      Typical setup used throughout this paper to compute the Casimir-Lifsh*tz force between a metal and a metamaterial.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (14)

      Figure 2

      An incident plane wave impinging on a uniaxial metamaterial with its optic axis perpendicular to the z=0 plane.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (15)

      Figure 3

      An incident plane wave impinging on a biaxial metamaterial with orthorhombic symmetry (see text).Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (16)

      Figure 4

      The ratio FFC for a gold half-space facing an isotropic, interconnected, and silver-based metamaterial. FA is the Casimir force per unit area in this setup FCA=cπ2240a4 is the Casimir force per unit area between two perfect plane conductors and F<0(F>0) corresponds to a repulsive (attractive) force. The frequency scale Ω=2πcΛ is chosen as the silver plasma frequency ΩD=1.43×1016rads. Parameters are for the metal, Ω1Ω=0.96, γ1Ω=0.004, and for the metamaterial, ΩDΩ=1, γDΩ=0.006, ΩeΩ=0.04, ΩmΩ=0.1, ωeΩ=ωmΩ=0.1, γeΩ=γmΩ=0.005. The inset shows the magnetic permeability μ2(iξ) and the electric permittivity ϵ2(iξ) of the MM for the different filling factors.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (17)

      Figure 5

      The effects of uniaxial anisotropy in the Casimir force between a gold semispace and a metallic-based connected MM with weak Drude background. The distance is fixed to d=Λ and repulsion corresponds to negative values of FFC. All parameters are the same as in Fig. 4 except for the filling factors fx and fz, which are the variables in this plot.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (18)

      Figure 6

      The Casimir force between a gold half-space and an orthorhombic, slightly in-plane anisotropic MM for different values of the filling factors fx and fy. The bands are characterized by a certain value of fx, as shown in the legend, and a continuum of values of fy, from fy=0.8fx to fy=1.2fx. All the other parameters involved are exactly the same as those used in Fig. 4.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (19)

      Figure 7

      The ratio FFC between a gold half-space and an isotropic silver-based metamaterial for different values of the dissipation parameters. The main plot shows the effect of the simultaneous modification of electric and magnetic dissipation. Inset (a) shows the effect of electric dissipation alone for different values of the ratio γeΩe=0.1 (solid), 0.5 (dashed), 2.5 (dotted). Inset (b)s shows the effect of magnetic dissipation alone for different values of the ratio γmΩm=0.1 (solid), 0.5 (dashed), 2.5 (dotted). The filling factor is f=104 in all three plots, and all other parameters except the dissipation coefficients are the same as in Fig. 4.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (20)

      Figure 8

      Temperature dependence of the Casimir force between a metallic plate and a metamaterial. We plot the Casimir force between a metamaterial and a Drude metal (a) or a plasma metal (b) for different temperatures. We stress that negative values of the force characterize repulsion, and that all parameters are the same as the ones used in the f=0 curve of Fig. 4.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (21)

      Figure 9

      The ratio FFC for a gold half-space facing an isotropic, nonconnected, and gold-based metamaterial. The parameters for the metal are Ω2,metΩ=0.96, γ2,metΩ=0.004, and for the metamaterial we have ΩeΩ=0.34, ΩmΩ=0.064, ωeΩ=0.2, ωmΩ=0.15, γeΩ=0.04, γmΩ=0.02, f=0.1. The inset shows the permittivity and permeability inside the MM, as given by Eq. (67), but as functions of imaginary frequencies ξ.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (22)

      Figure 10

      The permittivity ϵtrue(iξ) and permeability μtrue(iξ). The parameters are ϵ=2, ΩpolΩ=0.4, ωpolΩ=0.15, γpolΩ=0.001.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (23)

      Figure 11

      The plot of ΔP=P(2)P(1) for different temperatures and models. Following our conventions throughout the paper, a positive force means attraction. The parameters of P(1) are the same used in Fig. 8, in dimensional units they are ΩD=1.32×1016rads, γD=5.48×1013rads (γD=0 for the plasma curve), Ωe=4.7×1015rads, Ωm=8.7×1014rads, ωe=2.7×1015rads, ωm=2×1015rads, γe=5.5×1014rads, γm=2.7×1014rads, Ω2,1=2.52×1016rads, ω2,1=2.48×1016rads, Ω2,2=6.4×1015rads, ω2,2=3.8×1015rads, Ω2,3=ω2,3=1.9×1014rads, γ2,1=γ2,2=γ2,3=0, f=0.1, and the parameters of P(2) are exactly the same except for Ωe=0. The inset shows the same plot on a different scale, since in the larger one it is not possible to see ΔP for large distances.Reuse & Permissions

    • Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (24)

      Figure 12

      The difference in frequency shifts caused by the presence or absence of magnetic activity in the metamaterial. Everything is assumed to be at zero temperature. The MM is the same used in Fig. 11 and the parameters for the Rb atom are m=1.45×1025Kg, α0=4.74×1023cm3, and ω0=2.54×1015rads, with an unperturbed trap frequency of ωz=2π×229Hz.Reuse & Permissions

    ×

    Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials (2024)
    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Duane Harber

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5611

    Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

    Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Duane Harber

    Birthday: 1999-10-17

    Address: Apt. 404 9899 Magnolia Roads, Port Royceville, ID 78186

    Phone: +186911129794335

    Job: Human Hospitality Planner

    Hobby: Listening to music, Orienteering, Knapping, Dance, Mountain biking, Fishing, Pottery

    Introduction: My name is Duane Harber, I am a modern, clever, handsome, fair, agreeable, inexpensive, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.